A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours about the construction of a wall in a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a case which includes attracted countrywide consideration next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Situations report about René Collier as well as Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction performs at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their preparing permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment with a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such areas are topic to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, significantly in the delicate coastal natural environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, that is partially constructed, is in the correct place. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal planning disputes, in which views of The ocean are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image which has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain visual proof with the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the h2o throughout serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm drinking water to photograph the location grew to become The most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting in its place that it is about making certain that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've described their very long-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple just looking to make a spouse and children dwelling in accordance with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Area of Conservation and say that every one will work are actually completed determined by Skilled assistance and accepted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, including coming into The ocean through a storm, don't change the fundamental info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute more than development of wall at coastal web page is now a shorthand description for your problem that many observers see as more and more widespread. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Times write-up about René Collier pointed out which the businessman experienced Beforehand been associated with community advocacy on arranging and environmental problems, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely unique professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-higher h2o throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both equally the Bodily truth from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as developed complies with arranging authorization and whether any encroachment into a Unique Location of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and preparing conditions. Yet the human component stays central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long once the authorized expenditures are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the case prolong further than that deal with. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition it underscores how promptly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic splendor and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Irrespective of whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will depend upon the court’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue on to appear in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most closely watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.