A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier as well as Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has due to the fact turn into emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Assemble Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website in the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how The 2 men entered the h2o in the course of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the positioning became one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 27 Jan 2026 have been included intimately through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second during the authorized timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of preparing paperwork, maps, and problems hooked up on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply seeking to create a spouse and children residence in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Particular Area of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed according to Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with one another long after the legal expenses have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic issues for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or done as planned will rely on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.